PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGB.L vs. ERNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGB.L vs. ERNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly higher than ERNS.L's 1.98% return.


REGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-18.93%
6M
-12.75%
YTD
7.20%
1Y
68.04%
3Y*
-3.16%
5Y*
10Y*

ERNS.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.99%
YTD
1.98%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGB.L vs. ERNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
7.20%75.67%-34.55%-22.78%-22.89%-20.32%
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
1.98%4.84%5.55%4.76%1.53%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between REGB.L and ERNS.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGB.L vs. ERNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGB.L
REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNS.L
ERNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGB.L vs. ERNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGB.LERNS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

2.40

-1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

19.43

-17.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

108.42

-101.70

REGB.L vs. ERNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGB.L and ERNS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REGB.L vs. ERNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, which is greater than ERNS.L's maximum drawdown of -1.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and ERNS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGB.LERNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.24%

-1.51%

-72.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.69%

-0.22%

-28.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.98%

-0.22%

-59.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.52%

-0.03%

-41.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.79%

-0.05%

-44.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.16%

0.04%

+10.12%

Volatility

REGB.L vs. ERNS.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) at 0.19%. This indicates that REGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGB.LERNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.93%

0.19%

+10.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.91%

0.65%

+32.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.93%

0.79%

+45.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.32%

0.82%

+45.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.32%

0.92%

+45.40%

REGB.L vs. ERNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGB.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNS.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGB.L vs. ERNS.L - Dividend Comparison

REGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
4.28%4.65%5.42%4.54%1.14%0.28%0.75%1.04%0.74%0.52%0.81%0.72%
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGB.L and ERNS.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REGB.L.

REGB.L is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while ERNS.L is Ultrashort Bond. REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while ERNS.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REGB.L and 0.09% for ERNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGB.L and ERNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer