REDWX vs. FEQHX
REDWX (Aspiration Redwood Fund) and FEQHX (Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, REDWX returned 15.99%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for FEQHX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REDWX charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FEQHX.
Performance
REDWX vs. FEQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REDWX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly lower than FEQHX's 10.01% return.
REDWX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
FEQHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REDWX vs. FEQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REDWX Aspiration Redwood Fund | 8.62% | 18.06% | 7.91% | 23.24% | -3.21% |
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 10.01% | 13.61% | 19.46% | 17.65% | -4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between REDWX and FEQHX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between REDWX and FEQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REDWX vs. FEQHX — Risk / Return Rank
REDWX
FEQHX
REDWX vs. FEQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiration Redwood Fund (REDWX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REDWX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.11 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 12.42 | -5.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REDWX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.52 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.32 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
REDWX vs. FEQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REDWX drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, which is greater than FEQHX's maximum drawdown of -10.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REDWX and FEQHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REDWX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -10.42% | -30.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.47% | -7.40% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.23% | -10.42% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -2.22% | -3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 1.85% | +1.70% |
Volatility
REDWX vs. FEQHX - Volatility Comparison
Aspiration Redwood Fund (REDWX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) at 2.68%. This indicates that REDWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REDWX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 2.68% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 6.63% | +3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 9.15% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 11.24% | +6.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 11.24% | +9.13% |
REDWX vs. FEQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
REDWX has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQHX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
REDWX vs. FEQHX - Dividend Comparison
REDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.59%, more than FEQHX's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 0.51% | 0.43% | 0.61% | 0.77% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REDWX Aspiration Redwood Fund | 11.59% | 12.59% | 7.55% | 0.44% | 2.40% | 9.99% | 0.00% | 9.08% | 9.75% | 4.66% | 5.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REDWX and FEQHX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REDWX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to FEQHX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REDWX dropped -41.09% vs FEQHX's -10.42%.
FEQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REDWX and FEQHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer