PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REDWX vs. AMFEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REDWX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GreenFi Redwood Fund (REDWX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REDWX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than AMFEX's 15.43% return.


REDWX

1D
1.84%
1M
2.59%
6M
11.88%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
18.14%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
12.83%
ALL TIME*
13.15%

AMFEX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.36%
6M
9.05%
YTD
15.43%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

REDWX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
REDWX
GreenFi Redwood Fund
10.04%18.06%7.91%23.24%-20.30%26.83%15.89%37.29%-10.93%
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
15.43%17.33%16.28%17.32%-14.08%22.58%12.70%24.62%-9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between REDWX and AMFEX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.90

The correlation between REDWX and AMFEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REDWX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REDWX
REDWX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
REDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
REDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
REDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
REDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFEX
AMFEX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AMFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REDWX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GreenFi Redwood Fund (REDWX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REDWXAMFEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

4.42

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

18.45

-13.04

REDWX vs. AMFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REDWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the AMFEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REDWX and AMFEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REDWX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REDWX drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REDWX and AMFEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REDWXAMFEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-30.41%

-10.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-6.07%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.23%

-15.23%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-21.21%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-4.23%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

1.45%

+2.25%

Volatility

REDWX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison

GreenFi Redwood Fund (REDWX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 2.54%. This indicates that REDWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REDWXAMFEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.54%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

7.80%

+3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

10.03%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

14.23%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

16.84%

+3.50%

REDWX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REDWX has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

REDWX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison

REDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.44%, more than AMFEX's 10.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
10.39%11.99%9.19%0.92%4.82%0.22%0.44%0.78%0.83%0.00%0.00%
REDWX
GreenFi Redwood Fund
11.44%12.59%7.55%0.44%2.40%9.99%0.00%9.08%9.75%4.66%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


REDWX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REDWX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to AMFEX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REDWX dropped -41.09% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.

AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REDWX and AMFEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer