PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVI vs. TDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDVI vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 19.32% return, which is significantly higher than TDEC's 9.40% return.


RDVI

1D
1.36%
1M
3.24%
6M
14.75%
YTD
19.32%
1Y
30.66%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.18%

TDEC

1D
0.71%
1M
1.79%
6M
4.73%
YTD
9.40%
1Y
18.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.62M$24.09M$18.88M
$49.72K$73.74K$193.92K

RDVI vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDVI and TDEC is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.57

The correlation between RDVI and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVI vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDVI
RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDVI vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDVITDECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.28

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

9.26

+5.96

RDVI vs. TDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVI Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the TDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVI and TDEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDVI vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, which is greater than TDEC's maximum drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and TDEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVITDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.35%

-10.30%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-8.16%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.55%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-1.12%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.01%

+0.01%

Volatility

RDVI vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) at 3.45%. This indicates that RDVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVITDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.45%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

10.28%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

11.07%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

11.96%

+4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

11.96%

+4.87%

RDVI vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDVI vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison

RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, while TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
RDVI
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
7.58%8.10%8.62%8.45%1.53%
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDVI and TDEC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVI has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to TDEC (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVI dropped -18.35% vs TDEC's -10.30%.

On 1-year performance, RDVI leads with 30.66% vs 18.55% for TDEC. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 30.66% return vs 18.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.58%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.

RDVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while TDEC is Defined Outcome. RDVI tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RDVI and 0.95% for TDEC.

RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVI and TDEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer