PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVI vs. TDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDVI vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 13.85% return, which is significantly higher than TDEC's 7.78% return.


RDVI

1D
0.42%
1M
5.10%
YTD
13.85%
6M
12.01%
1Y
27.86%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
10Y*

TDEC

1D
0.12%
1M
0.03%
YTD
7.78%
6M
8.71%
1Y
18.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVI vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDVI and TDEC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.56

The correlation between RDVI and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVI vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVI
RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVI vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDVITDECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.27

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

9.79

+4.12

RDVI vs. TDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVI Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the TDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVI and TDEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDVI vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, which is greater than TDEC's maximum drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and TDEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVITDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.35%

-10.30%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-8.16%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-2.02%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-1.05%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.89%

+0.12%

Volatility

RDVI vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) at 4.52%. This indicates that RDVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVITDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

4.52%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

9.98%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

10.70%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

12.02%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

12.02%

+4.93%

RDVI vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDVI vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison

RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, while TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
RDVI
FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
7.63%8.10%8.62%8.45%1.53%
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDVI and TDEC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVI has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to TDEC (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVI dropped -18.35% vs TDEC's -10.30%.

On 1-year performance, RDVI leads with 27.86% vs 18.47% for TDEC. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 27.86% return vs 18.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.63%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.

RDVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while TDEC is Defined Outcome. RDVI tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RDVI and 0.95% for TDEC.

RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVI and TDEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer