RDVI vs. RWL
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL).
RDVI and RWL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RDVI is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. It was launched on Oct 19, 2022. RWL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 19, 2008. Both RDVI and RWL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RDVI vs. RWL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RDVI vs. RWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 0.25% | 17.93% | 14.56% | 18.63% | 9.91% |
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF | 1.02% | 18.65% | 16.45% | 17.43% | 6.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than RWL's 1.02% return.
RDVI
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RWL
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 17.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RDVI vs. RWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RWL's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RDVI vs. RWL — Risk / Return Rank
RDVI
RWL
RDVI vs. RWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDVI | RWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.17 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.71 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.57 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 7.53 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDVI | RWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.17 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.55 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVI and RWL is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RDVI vs. RWL - Dividend Comparison
RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.38%, more than RWL's 1.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 8.38% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.43% | 1.60% | 1.62% | 1.35% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
RDVI vs. RWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum RWL drawdown of -54.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and RWL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVI | RWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -54.83% | +36.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -11.26% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -4.46% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -6.50% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.35% | +0.45% |
Volatility
RDVI vs. RWL - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) at 3.93%. This indicates that RDVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RDVI | RWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 3.93% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 7.72% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 15.11% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 14.55% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 16.88% | +0.16% |