RDVI vs. JELM
RDVI (FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) and JELM (Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. RDVI is passively managed, while JELM is actively managed. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RDVI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JELM.
Performance
RDVI vs. JELM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RDVI
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 14.75%
- YTD
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 30.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.18%
JELM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $199.95K | $786.17K | $963.17K | |
| $26.62M | $24.09M | $18.88M |
RDVI vs. JELM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 10.84% |
JELM Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVI and JELM is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVI vs. JELM — Risk / Return Rank
RDVI
JELM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDVI vs. JELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF (JELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVI | JELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVI vs. JELM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, which is greater than JELM's maximum drawdown of -0.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and JELM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVI | JELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -0.69% | -17.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.25% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -0.21% | -2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | — | — |
Volatility
RDVI vs. JELM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVI | JELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 3.69% | +10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 3.69% | +13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 3.69% | +13.14% |
RDVI vs. JELM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JELM's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDVI vs. JELM - Dividend Comparison
RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, more than JELM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JELM Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.58% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVI and JELM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JELM is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JELM is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RDVI.
RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.58%, compared with 1.21% for JELM.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RDVI and 0.59% for JELM.
Find the right allocation for RDVI and JELM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer