RDVI vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. RDVI is passively managed, while ARMW is actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDVI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

RDVI vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 336.58% return.

RDVI

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 10.69%
• 6M: 11.63%
• 1Y: 26.63%
• 3Y*: 19.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: -5.75%
• 1M: 108.38%
• YTD: 336.58%
• 6M: 222.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVI vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	10.69%	3.47%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	336.58%	-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVI and ARMW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.44

RDVI vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDVI	ARMW
Financial Services	36.5%	-
Technology	17.6%	36.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	-
Industrials	12.2%	-
Healthcare	8.1%	-
Communication Services	5.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	-
Energy	1.4%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RDVI vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVI

RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 64
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 60
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVI vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RDVI	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.31	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDVI	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	4.33	-3.12

Drawdowns

RDVI vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDVI	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.35%	-48.47%	+30.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.75%	+5.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-26.42%	+23.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDVI	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.30%	88.57%	-75.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.91%	88.57%	-71.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.91%	88.57%	-71.66%

RDVI vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDVI vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, less than ARMW's 16.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	16.13%	16.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	7.85%	8.10%	8.62%	8.45%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDVI and ARMW in my portfolio?

RDVI and ARMW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RDVI or ARMW?

On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDVI or ARMW?

RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDVI or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 16.13%, compared with 7.85% for RDVI.

What is the main difference between RDVI and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RDVI and 0.99% for ARMW.