PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDTY vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDTY vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTY achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 9.40% return.


RDTY

1D
-0.18%
1M
4.30%
YTD
16.87%
6M
14.33%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
-0.15%
1M
-8.76%
YTD
9.40%
6M
9.08%
1Y
80.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTY vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDTY and GOOY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDTY vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTY
RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTY vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDTYGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.58

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

5.03

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

17.63

-8.90

RDTY vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTY and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDTY vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTY drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTY and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDTYGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-24.40%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-16.15%

+6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-12.00%

+10.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-6.29%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

4.60%

-1.85%

Volatility

RDTY vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) is 5.74%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that RDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDTYGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

8.16%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

17.70%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.51%

23.65%

-6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

23.41%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

23.41%

-1.38%

RDTY vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDTY vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

RDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.37%, less than GOOY's 52.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
52.79%41.50%36.74%7.90%
RDTY
YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
42.37%36.75%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDTY and GOOY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOY has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to RDTY (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTY dropped -17.31% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 80.84% vs 23.90% for RDTY. On fees, GOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RDTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 80.84% return vs 23.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 52.79%, compared with 42.37% for RDTY.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for RDTY and 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDTY and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer