PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDTY vs. FYEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDTY vs. FYEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTY achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than FYEE's 7.28% return.


RDTY

1D
0.72%
1M
1.49%
YTD
13.72%
6M
13.39%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FYEE

1D
0.23%
1M
2.96%
YTD
7.28%
6M
8.57%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTY vs. FYEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDTY and FYEE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

0.72

The correlation between RDTY and FYEE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDTY vs. FYEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTY
RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FYEE
FYEE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FYEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYEE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FYEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYEE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTY vs. FYEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDTYFYEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.52

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.37

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

17.26

-7.88

RDTY vs. FYEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the FYEE Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTY and FYEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDTYFYEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.59

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.25

-0.33

Drawdowns

RDTY vs. FYEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTY drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum FYEE drawdown of -18.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTY and FYEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDTYFYEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-18.79%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-7.39%

-1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.07%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-2.25%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

1.44%

+1.29%

Volatility

RDTY vs. FYEE - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE) at 1.39%. This indicates that RDTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDTYFYEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

1.39%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

7.25%

+5.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

9.63%

+7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

13.83%

+8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

13.83%

+8.22%

RDTY vs. FYEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FYEE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDTY vs. FYEE - Dividend Comparison

RDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.97%, more than FYEE's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FYEE
Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF
7.55%7.08%5.45%
RDTY
YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
43.97%36.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDTY and FYEE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDTY has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to FYEE (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTY dropped -17.31% vs FYEE's -18.79%.

On 1-year performance, RDTY leads with 25.49% vs 24.81% for FYEE. On fees, FYEE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FYEE has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDTY has performed better with a 25.49% return vs 24.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FYEE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.

RDTY has the higher dividend yield at 43.97%, compared with 7.55% for FYEE.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for RDTY and 0.28% for FYEE.

FYEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDTY and FYEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer