PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDTY vs. FIAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDTY vs. FIAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RDTY having a 13.72% return and FIAT slightly lower at 13.21%.


RDTY

1D
0.72%
1M
1.49%
YTD
13.72%
6M
13.39%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FIAT

1D
-0.56%
1M
13.73%
YTD
13.21%
6M
31.80%
1Y
-1.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTY vs. FIAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDTY and FIAT is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

-0.56

The correlation between RDTY and FIAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.56 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDTY vs. FIAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTY
RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FIAT
FIAT Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FIAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FIAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIAT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTY vs. FIAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDTYFIATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.04

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

-0.05

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

-0.07

+9.45

RDTY vs. FIAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the FIAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTY and FIAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDTYFIATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

-0.03

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

-0.38

+1.30

Drawdowns

RDTY vs. FIAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTY drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum FIAT drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTY and FIAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDTYFIATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-70.50%

+53.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-42.26%

+33.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-51.21%

+50.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-45.36%

+42.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

27.35%

-24.62%

Volatility

RDTY vs. FIAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) is 5.92%, while YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) has a volatility of 15.31%. This indicates that RDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDTYFIATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

15.31%

-9.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

42.02%

-29.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

55.36%

-38.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

60.50%

-38.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

60.50%

-38.45%

RDTY vs. FIAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FIAT's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDTY vs. FIAT - Dividend Comparison

RDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.97%, less than FIAT's 96.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FIAT
YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
96.37%178.11%70.99%
RDTY
YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
43.97%36.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDTY and FIAT have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIAT has higher volatility (15.31%) compared to RDTY (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTY dropped -17.31% vs FIAT's -70.50%.

On 1-year performance, RDTY leads with 25.49% vs -1.90% for FIAT. On fees, FIAT is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RDTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDTY has performed better with a 25.49% return vs -1.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIAT is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.

FIAT has the higher dividend yield at 96.37%, compared with 43.97% for RDTY.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for RDTY and 0.99% for FIAT.

RDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDTY and FIAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer