PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDLAX vs. MEIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDLAX vs. MEIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund (RDLAX) and Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDLAX achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than MEIFX's 5.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RDLAX has outperformed MEIFX with an annualized return of 16.19%, while MEIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.93% annualized return.


RDLAX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-3.18%
6M
3.22%
YTD
3.22%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
16.19%

MEIFX

1D
0.58%
1M
0.51%
6M
5.19%
YTD
5.19%
1Y
6.31%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
13.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDLAX vs. MEIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDLAX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund
3.22%18.41%28.05%40.80%-27.93%29.54%28.33%28.27%-3.92%28.84%
MEIFX
Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund
5.19%6.51%13.19%18.96%-16.43%15.15%26.18%44.95%-0.51%27.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RDLAX and MEIFX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between RDLAX and MEIFX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDLAX vs. MEIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDLAX
RDLAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RDLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RDLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIFX
MEIFX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MEIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDLAX vs. MEIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund (RDLAX) and Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDLAXMEIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.41

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

4.34

-0.41

RDLAX vs. MEIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the MEIFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDLAX and MEIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDLAX vs. MEIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDLAX drawdown since its inception was -51.56%, smaller than the maximum MEIFX drawdown of -54.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDLAX and MEIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDLAXMEIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.56%

-54.37%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.93%

-4.80%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.85%

-19.30%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.07%

-23.54%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.07%

-28.67%

-15.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-1.03%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-7.70%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

1.54%

+3.25%

Volatility

RDLAX vs. MEIFX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund (RDLAX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX) at 3.72%. This indicates that RDLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDLAXMEIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

3.72%

+2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

6.91%

+6.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.73%

9.56%

+7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.03%

15.95%

+10.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

17.94%

+5.40%

RDLAX vs. MEIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDLAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIFX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDLAX vs. MEIFX - Dividend Comparison

RDLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, more than MEIFX's 6.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIFX
Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund
6.89%7.25%14.61%0.61%9.28%25.44%13.26%40.49%11.67%1.18%0.78%4.24%
RDLAX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund
7.88%8.13%10.15%5.75%12.48%25.33%12.58%8.06%15.56%13.13%6.15%13.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDLAX and MEIFX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDLAX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to MEIFX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDLAX dropped -51.56% vs MEIFX's -54.37%.

RDLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDLAX and MEIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer