RCMFX vs. ATGAX
RCMFX (Schwartz Value Focused Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. RCMFX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
RCMFX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RCMFX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCMFX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RCMFX Schwartz Value Focused Fund | 0.00% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCMFX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwartz Value Focused Fund (RCMFX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCMFX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 58.33 | — |
Drawdowns
RCMFX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCMFX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | 0.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
RCMFX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCMFX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 9.26% | — |
RCMFX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCMFX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCMFX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
Neither RCMFX nor ATGAX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCMFX Schwartz Value Focused Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 30.02% | 4.29% | 0.87% | 6.72% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 2.81% | 7.64% |
Find the right allocation for RCMFX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer