PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCKSX vs. WOGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RCKSX vs. WOGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) and White Oak Select Growth Fund (WOGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCKSX achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly higher than WOGSX's 10.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RCKSX has underperformed WOGSX with an annualized return of 10.85%, while WOGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.


RCKSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.87%
YTD
14.10%
6M
14.42%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.85%

WOGSX

1D
0.50%
1M
4.51%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.11%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCKSX vs. WOGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
14.10%12.99%15.12%15.57%-18.09%9.96%13.75%19.05%-2.14%22.69%
WOGSX
White Oak Select Growth Fund
10.95%24.07%18.22%26.48%-25.72%28.31%18.91%23.74%-0.55%19.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RCKSX and WOGSX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between RCKSX and WOGSX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCKSX vs. WOGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCKSX
RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

WOGSX
WOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
WOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCKSX vs. WOGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) and White Oak Select Growth Fund (WOGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RCKSXWOGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

2.95

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.18

11.65

+2.54

RCKSX vs. WOGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCKSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the WOGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCKSX and WOGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RCKSXWOGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.35

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.59

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.73

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.43

-0.05

Drawdowns

RCKSX vs. WOGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCKSX drawdown since its inception was -57.88%, smaller than the maximum WOGSX drawdown of -79.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCKSX and WOGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCKSXWOGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.88%

-79.10%

+21.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.14%

-11.20%

+7.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.22%

-22.07%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.54%

-31.56%

+9.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

-31.56%

-1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.75%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

-28.39%

+18.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.83%

-1.34%

Volatility

RCKSX vs. WOGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) is 2.94%, while White Oak Select Growth Fund (WOGSX) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that RCKSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WOGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCKSXWOGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.63%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

10.70%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

14.04%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

19.95%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

19.90%

-2.35%

RCKSX vs. WOGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCKSX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WOGSX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

RCKSX vs. WOGSX - Dividend Comparison

RCKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than WOGSX's 7.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
5.48%6.26%0.47%0.71%1.00%4.31%16.56%3.18%0.59%5.91%0.70%3.21%
WOGSX
White Oak Select Growth Fund
7.34%8.14%12.24%5.00%0.49%5.18%2.57%1.81%1.40%0.66%1.02%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


RCKSX and WOGSX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WOGSX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to RCKSX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCKSX dropped -57.88% vs WOGSX's -79.10%.

WOGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCKSX and WOGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer