PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO

Last updated Jul 2, 2026
See Documentation

RCI-B.TO (Rogers Communications Inc) is a stock, while CMR.TO (iShares Premium Money Market ETF) is Money Market fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past 10 years, RCI-B.TO returned 2.19%/yr vs 1.92%/yr for CMR.TO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Rogers Communications Inc (RCI-B.TO) and iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCI-B.TO achieves a -9.27% return, which is significantly lower than CMR.TO's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RCI-B.TO has outperformed CMR.TO with an annualized return of 2.19%, while CMR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.92% annualized return.

RCI-B.TO

1D
-4.63%
1M
-14.28%
6M
-9.27%
YTD
-9.27%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
-4.91%
5Y*
-3.38%
10Y*
2.19%

CMR.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.21%
6M
1.17%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
2.48%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RCI-B.TO
Rogers Communications Inc		-9.27%22.76%-26.08%1.25%8.69%5.03%-4.94%-5.06%12.53%27.57%
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF		1.17%2.78%4.70%4.70%1.72%0.01%0.47%1.63%1.29%0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RCI-B.TO and CMR.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2008

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Rogers Communications Inc

iShares Premium Money Market ETF

Often compared with RCI-B.TO:
RCI-B.TO vs. BCE.TORCI-B.TO vs. T.TORCI-B.TO vs. SKMRCI-B.TO vs. BAM.TORCI-B.TO vs. RY.TORCI-B.TO vs. ^GSPCRCI-B.TO vs. VZ
Often compared with CMR.TO:
CMR.TO vs. ZMMK.TOCMR.TO vs. CASH.TOCMR.TO vs. CBIL.TOCMR.TO vs. XFR.TOCMR.TO vs. MNY.TOCMR.TO vs. HSAV.TOCMR.TO vs. VOO

Return for Risk

RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RCI-B.TO
RCI-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RCI-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCI-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCI-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RCI-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCI-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
CMR.TO
CMR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CMR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CMR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rogers Communications Inc (RCI-B.TO) and iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RCI-B.TOCMR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.71
12.38

-11.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.27
38.83

-37.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

13.26

-12.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

124.50

-123.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

569.63

-566.89

RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCI-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the CMR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 12.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCI-B.TO and CMR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCI-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.78%, which is greater than CMR.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCI-B.TO and CMR.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RCI-B.TOCMR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.78%

-0.52%

-51.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.23%

-0.02%

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.17%

-0.04%

-46.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.78%

-0.04%

-51.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.78%

-0.14%

-51.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.78%

0.00%

-28.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.08%

-0.01%

-15.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.84%

0.00%

+6.84%

Volatility

RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO - Volatility Comparison

Rogers Communications Inc (RCI-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that RCI-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RCI-B.TOCMR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

0.06%

+8.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.17%

0.15%

+22.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.68%

0.20%

+26.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

0.27%

+20.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

0.27%

+21.58%

Dividends

RCI-B.TO vs. CMR.TO - Dividend Comparison

RCI-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than CMR.TO's 2.45% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF		2.45%2.81%4.56%4.64%1.63%0.01%0.47%1.60%1.33%0.61%0.43%0.48%
RCI-B.TO
Rogers Communications Inc		4.33%3.86%4.53%3.22%3.16%3.32%3.37%3.10%2.74%3.00%3.71%4.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

RCI-B.TO and CMR.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCI-B.TO and CMR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer