RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) and ZWB.TO (BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCDC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by RBC, while ZWB.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RCDC.TO returned 20.47%/yr vs 30.29%/yr for ZWB.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RCDC.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for ZWB.TO.

Performance

RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCDC.TO achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly lower than ZWB.TO's 26.23% return.

RCDC.TO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 14.92%
• 6M: 15.15%
• 1Y: 31.50%
• 3Y*: 20.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZWB.TO

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 7.50%
• YTD: 26.23%
• 6M: 26.02%
• 1Y: 61.42%
• 3Y*: 30.29%
• 5Y*: 15.76%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF	14.92%	19.29%	17.27%	1.66%
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF	26.23%	34.91%	19.41%	0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between RCDC.TO and ZWB.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023	0.52

Over the past year, RCDC.TO and ZWB.TO have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCDC.TO

RCDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
RCDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
RCDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RCDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
RCDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RCDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ZWB.TO

ZWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ZWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ZWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ZWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCDC.TO	ZWB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.80	5.36	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.48	7.28	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	2.02	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.83	7.89	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.04	35.44	-6.40

RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCDC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is comparable to the ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCDC.TO and ZWB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum ZWB.TO drawdown of -39.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDC.TO and ZWB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCDC.TO	ZWB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.88%	-39.36%	+28.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.43%	-7.82%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.88%	-14.05%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-5.54%	+3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.74%	-0.65%

Volatility

RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) is 2.02%, while BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that RCDC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCDC.TO	ZWB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	3.38%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.64%	9.95%	-3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.33%	11.51%	-3.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.11%	12.65%	-2.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.11%	15.67%	-5.56%

RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCDC.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than ZWB.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCDC.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Dividend Comparison

RCDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than ZWB.TO's 4.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF	5.73%	6.38%	6.46%	6.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF	4.62%	5.38%	6.66%	7.62%	7.30%	5.46%	5.80%	5.53%	5.59%	4.80%	5.04%	5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCDC.TO and ZWB.TO in my portfolio?

RCDC.TO and ZWB.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCDC.TO or ZWB.TO?

On fees, RCDC.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCDC.TO or ZWB.TO?

RCDC.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for ZWB.TO.

What is the main difference between RCDC.TO and ZWB.TO?

RCDC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZWB.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: RBC and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for RCDC.TO and 0.72% for ZWB.TO.