RCDC.TO vs. YPLT.NEO
RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) and YPLT.NEO (Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RCDC.TO returned 31.07% vs -13.87% for YPLT.NEO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCDC.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for YPLT.NEO.
Performance
RCDC.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCDC.TO achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly higher than YPLT.NEO's -31.78% return.
RCDC.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 31.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YPLT.NEO
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- -20.69%
- YTD
- -31.78%
- 6M
- -37.99%
- 1Y
- -13.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCDC.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 15.05% | 17.94% |
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -31.78% | 62.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCDC.TO and YPLT.NEO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCDC.TO vs. YPLT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
RCDC.TO
YPLT.NEO
RCDC.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCDC.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.01 | +0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.75 | -0.33 | +6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.64 | -0.69 | +29.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCDC.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum YPLT.NEO drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDC.TO and YPLT.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCDC.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -42.43% | +31.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -42.43% | +37.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -42.43% | +41.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -16.09% | +14.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 20.30% | -19.21% |
Volatility
RCDC.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) is 2.10%, while Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) has a volatility of 20.85%. This indicates that RCDC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YPLT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCDC.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 20.85% | -18.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.70% | 47.78% | -41.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.36% | 61.83% | -53.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.11% | 69.56% | -59.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.11% | 69.56% | -59.45% |
RCDC.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCDC.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than YPLT.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCDC.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Dividend Comparison
RCDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than YPLT.NEO's 61.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 6.32% | 6.38% | 6.46% | 6.49% |
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 61.08% | 14.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCDC.TO and YPLT.NEO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YPLT.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YPLT.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for RCDC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: RBC and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for RCDC.TO and 0.40% for YPLT.NEO.
Find the right allocation for RCDC.TO and YPLT.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer