RCDC.TO vs. YNVD.NEO
RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) and YNVD.NEO (NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RCDC.TO returned 29.08% vs 68.73% for YNVD.NEO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCDC.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for YNVD.NEO.
Performance
RCDC.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCDC.TO achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly lower than YNVD.NEO's 17.05% return.
RCDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YNVD.NEO
- 1D
- -4.22%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 6M
- 27.60%
- 1Y
- 68.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCDC.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 12.49% | 19.29% | 18.74% |
YNVD.NEO NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 17.05% | 44.51% | 133.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCDC.TO and YNVD.NEO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCDC.TO vs. YNVD.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
RCDC.TO
YNVD.NEO
RCDC.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCDC.TO | YNVD.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.33 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.38 | 4.21 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.80 | 11.44 | +15.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCDC.TO | YNVD.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54 | 1.95 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 1.50 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
RCDC.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum YNVD.NEO drawdown of -41.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDC.TO and YNVD.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCDC.TO | YNVD.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -41.02% | +30.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -16.41% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -4.27% | +4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -8.83% | +6.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 6.03% | -4.94% |
Volatility
RCDC.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) is 2.49%, while NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO) has a volatility of 13.09%. This indicates that RCDC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YNVD.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCDC.TO | YNVD.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 13.09% | -10.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.71% | 27.53% | -20.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.25% | 35.44% | -27.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 52.47% | -42.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 52.47% | -42.32% |
RCDC.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCDC.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than YNVD.NEO's 1.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCDC.TO vs. YNVD.NEO - Dividend Comparison
RCDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than YNVD.NEO's 21.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 6.33% | 6.38% | 6.46% | 6.49% |
YNVD.NEO NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 21.78% | 23.48% | 17.81% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCDC.TO and YNVD.NEO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RCDC.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RCDC.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for YNVD.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: RBC and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for RCDC.TO and 1.94% for YNVD.NEO.
Find the right allocation for RCDC.TO and YNVD.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer