RCDC.TO vs. RUSB.TO
RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) and RUSB.TO (RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCDC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by RBC, while RUSB.TO is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RCDC.TO returned 20.53%/yr vs 7.46%/yr for RUSB.TO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
RCDC.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCDC.TO achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly higher than RUSB.TO's 3.15% return.
RCDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- YTD
- 18.89%
- 1Y
- 33.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RUSB.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- 6.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- —
RCDC.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 18.89% | 19.29% | 17.27% | 1.66% |
RUSB.TO RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 3.15% | 1.61% | 13.88% | 3.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCDC.TO and RUSB.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | -0.04 |
The correlation between RCDC.TO and RUSB.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (3 years) to 0.08 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCDC.TO vs. RUSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RCDC.TO
RUSB.TO
RCDC.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCDC.TO | RUSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.20 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.14 | 1.67 | +4.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.59 | 3.65 | +26.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCDC.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum RUSB.TO drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDC.TO and RUSB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCDC.TO | RUSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -14.28% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -3.60% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.88% | -5.26% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.72% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -4.11% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.64% | -0.55% |
Volatility
RCDC.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Volatility Comparison
RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.TO) at 1.78%. This indicates that RCDC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCDC.TO | RUSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 1.78% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.71% | 4.13% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.45% | 6.37% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 6.95% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 6.95% | +3.13% |
Dividends
RCDC.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Dividend Comparison
RCDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than RUSB.TO's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 6.12% | 6.38% | 6.46% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RUSB.TO RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 4.13% | 3.96% | 3.38% | 3.26% | 2.48% | 2.30% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 1.90% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCDC.TO and RUSB.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCDC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while RUSB.TO is Short-Term Bond.
Find the right allocation for RCDC.TO and RUSB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer