RCDC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) and JEPQ.TO (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCDC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by RBC, while JEPQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RCDC.TO returned 29.08% vs 31.41% for JEPQ.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCDC.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.TO.
Performance
RCDC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCDC.TO achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ.TO's 11.09% return.
RCDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCDC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 12.49% | 19.29% | 2.05% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 11.09% | 10.46% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCDC.TO and JEPQ.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCDC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RCDC.TO
JEPQ.TO
RCDC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCDC.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.48 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.38 | 4.08 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.80 | 16.30 | +10.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCDC.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54 | 2.51 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
RCDC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ.TO drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDC.TO and JEPQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCDC.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -20.05% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -7.74% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.40% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -3.36% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.93% | -0.84% |
Volatility
RCDC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) is 2.49%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that RCDC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCDC.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 4.05% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.71% | 9.88% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.25% | 12.58% | -4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 17.35% | -7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 17.35% | -7.20% |
RCDC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCDC.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCDC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
RCDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than JEPQ.TO's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 10.00% | 10.34% | 5.50% | 0.00% |
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 6.33% | 6.38% | 6.46% | 6.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCDC.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for RCDC.TO.
RCDC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: RBC and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for RCDC.TO and 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for RCDC.TO and JEPQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer