PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

RCDB.NEO (RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF) and ZSU.TO (BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, RCDB.NEO returned 2.27%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for ZSU.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO) and BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZSU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCDB.NEO achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than ZSU.TO's -0.12% return.

RCDB.NEO

1D
0.09%
1M
0.02%
6M
1.03%
YTD
1.36%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
—

ZSU.TO

1D
0.31%
1M
0.07%
6M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.12%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*
1.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RCDB.NEO
RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF		1.36%3.75%5.58%5.68%-4.07%-0.68%5.61%0.58%
ZSU.TO
BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF		-0.12%4.61%3.84%5.18%-6.17%-0.99%4.54%2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RCDB.NEO and ZSU.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019

0.29

The correlation between RCDB.NEO and ZSU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF

BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF

Often compared with RCDB.NEO:
RCDB.NEO vs. ZSDB.TORCDB.NEO vs. TSTX-U.TORCDB.NEO vs. RPF.TORCDB.NEO vs. RBNK.TORCDB.NEO vs. RIDH.TORCDB.NEO vs. TCSB.TORCDB.NEO vs. VSC.TO
Often compared with ZSU.TO:
ZSU.TO vs. CAGS.TOZSU.TO vs. TSTX-U.TOZSU.TO vs. ZMMK.TOZSU.TO vs. ZEB.TOZSU.TO vs. ZCN.TOZSU.TO vs. XSB.TOZSU.TO vs. ZAG.TO

Return for Risk

RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RCDB.NEO
RCDB.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RCDB.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
ZSU.TO
ZSU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ZSU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO) and BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RCDB.NEOZSU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.55
0.80

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.24
1.17

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.15

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.39

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

3.66

+4.22

RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCDB.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the ZSU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCDB.NEO and ZSU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCDB.NEO drawdown since its inception was -8.31%, smaller than the maximum ZSU.TO drawdown of -12.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDB.NEO and ZSU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RCDB.NEOZSU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.31%

-12.35%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-1.49%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.59%

-1.49%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.90%

-10.02%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-12.35%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.70%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-1.62%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

0.56%

-0.11%

Volatility

RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO - Volatility Comparison

RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO) and BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZSU.TO) have volatilities of 0.63% and 0.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RCDB.NEOZSU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.66%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

1.79%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31%

2.59%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.84%

3.68%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.44%

4.46%

+0.98%

Dividends

RCDB.NEO vs. ZSU.TO - Dividend Comparison

RCDB.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than ZSU.TO's 4.30% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCDB.NEO
RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF		2.17%1.96%1.58%1.22%1.16%1.33%1.68%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZSU.TO
BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF		4.30%3.76%3.31%3.17%3.23%2.97%2.99%2.78%2.49%2.30%2.07%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

RCDB.NEO and ZSU.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: RBC and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCDB.NEO and ZSU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer