PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

RBTZ.AX (BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF) and GLIN.AX (iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) are both Global Equities funds - RBTZ.AX tracks the BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index while GLIN.AX tracks the iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RBTZ.AX returned 6.26%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for GLIN.AX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) and iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBTZ.AX achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN.AX's 12.44% return.

RBTZ.AX

1D
-0.34%
1M
-4.15%
6M
-9.48%
YTD
-5.08%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
6.26%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
—

GLIN.AX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.78%
6M
12.69%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
RBTZ.AX
BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF		-5.08%5.25%24.18%7.71%
GLIN.AX
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		12.44%12.04%12.01%0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RBTZ.AX and GLIN.AX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF

iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Return for Risk

RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RBTZ.AX
RBTZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RBTZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX
GLIN.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GLIN.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) and iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RBTZ.AXGLIN.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.21
1.72

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.48
2.41

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.30

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

3.19

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

9.92

-9.27

RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBTZ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the GLIN.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBTZ.AX and GLIN.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBTZ.AX drawdown since its inception was -47.86%, which is greater than GLIN.AX's maximum drawdown of -12.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBTZ.AX and GLIN.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RBTZ.AXGLIN.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.86%

-12.66%

-35.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.55%

-5.76%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.01%

-12.66%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.86%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.19%

-1.16%

-10.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-2.24%

-11.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.79%

1.87%

+5.92%

Volatility

RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX) at 3.15%. This indicates that RBTZ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIN.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RBTZ.AXGLIN.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

3.15%

+4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.35%

8.80%

+9.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.26%

10.72%

+12.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.69%

12.33%

+10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

12.33%

+10.02%

Dividends

RBTZ.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Dividend Comparison

RBTZ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than GLIN.AX's 5.93% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GLIN.AX
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		5.93%2.94%2.60%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBTZ.AX
BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF		0.05%1.87%4.61%0.05%0.87%3.02%3.79%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

RBTZ.AX and GLIN.AX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBTZ.AX tracks BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index, while GLIN.AX tracks iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBTZ.AX and GLIN.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer