RBTZ.AX vs. GEAR.AX
RBTZ.AX (BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF) and GEAR.AX (Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF) are both Global Equities funds from BetaShares. RBTZ.AX is passively managed, while GEAR.AX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBTZ.AX returned 2.80%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for GEAR.AX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RBTZ.AX vs. GEAR.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBTZ.AX achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than GEAR.AX's 1.29% return.
RBTZ.AX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -9.48%
- YTD
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- —
GEAR.AX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
RBTZ.AX vs. GEAR.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBTZ.AX BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF | -5.08% | 5.25% | 24.18% | 37.27% | -38.23% | 14.53% | 38.97% | 32.73% | -21.72% |
GEAR.AX Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF | 1.29% | 15.80% | 13.80% | 15.84% | -9.50% | 36.03% | -11.97% | 52.03% | -21.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBTZ.AX and GEAR.AX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between RBTZ.AX and GEAR.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBTZ.AX vs. GEAR.AX — Risk / Return Rank
RBTZ.AX
GEAR.AX
RBTZ.AX vs. GEAR.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) and Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF (GEAR.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBTZ.AX | GEAR.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.31 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 0.66 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBTZ.AX vs. GEAR.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBTZ.AX drawdown since its inception was -47.86%, smaller than the maximum GEAR.AX drawdown of -66.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBTZ.AX and GEAR.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBTZ.AX | GEAR.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.86% | -66.50% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.55% | -17.82% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.01% | -30.91% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.86% | -32.27% | -15.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.19% | -8.41% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -12.21% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.79% | 8.40% | -0.61% |
Volatility
RBTZ.AX vs. GEAR.AX - Volatility Comparison
BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF (GEAR.AX) at 5.08%. This indicates that RBTZ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEAR.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBTZ.AX | GEAR.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 5.08% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.35% | 21.27% | -2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 25.91% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 29.72% | -7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 32.91% | -10.56% |
Dividends
RBTZ.AX vs. GEAR.AX - Dividend Comparison
RBTZ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than GEAR.AX's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEAR.AX Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF | 0.57% | 1.39% | 0.26% | 0.92% | 8.66% | 3.72% | 5.62% | 6.55% | 2.90% | 1.64% | 1.57% | 1.74% |
RBTZ.AX BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.05% | 1.87% | 4.61% | 0.05% | 0.87% | 3.02% | 3.79% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBTZ.AX and GEAR.AX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RBTZ.AX and GEAR.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer