RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RBTZ.AX (BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF) and BNKS.AX (BetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBTZ.AX is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while BNKS.AX is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Global ex-Australia Banks Hedged AUD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBTZ.AX returned 2.39%/yr vs 18.91%/yr for BNKS.AX. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.57% expense ratio.

Performance

RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) and BetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF (BNKS.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBTZ.AX achieves a -5.92% return, which is significantly lower than BNKS.AX's 20.40% return.

RBTZ.AX

• 1D: 5.00%
• 1M: -7.12%
• 6M: -4.81%
• YTD: -5.92%
• 1Y: -1.51%
• 3Y*: 5.68%
• 5Y*: 2.39%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.16%

BNKS.AX

• 1D: 2.45%
• 1M: 3.88%
• 6M: 19.15%
• YTD: 20.40%
• 1Y: 45.87%
• 3Y*: 33.60%
• 5Y*: 18.91%
• 10Y*: 12.93%
• ALL TIME*: 12.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BNKS.AX BetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF	A$519.53K	A$441.79K	A$716.43K
RBTZ.AX BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF	A$702.83K	A$802.78K	A$810.34K

RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RBTZ.AX BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF	-5.92%	5.25%	24.18%	37.27%	-38.23%	14.53%	38.97%	32.73%	-21.72%
BNKS.AX BetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF	20.40%	46.54%	29.51%	9.49%	-10.01%	26.47%	-21.37%	19.11%	-12.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RBTZ.AX and BNKS.AX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018	0.43

Return for Risk

RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBTZ.AX

RBTZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9
RBTZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
RBTZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
RBTZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
RBTZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
RBTZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

BNKS.AX

BNKS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 87
BNKS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BNKS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BNKS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BNKS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BNKS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) and BetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF (BNKS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBTZ.AX	BNKS.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	2.32	-2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.00	3.13	-3.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.41	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	3.19	-3.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	11.58	-11.92

RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBTZ.AX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the BNKS.AX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBTZ.AX and BNKS.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBTZ.AX drawdown since its inception was -47.86%, smaller than the maximum BNKS.AX drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBTZ.AX and BNKS.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBTZ.AX	BNKS.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.86%	-50.73%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.55%	-13.53%	-6.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.01%	-19.49%	-7.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.86%	-27.56%	-20.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.98%	-0.07%	-11.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.04%	-11.92%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.42%	3.78%	+4.64%

Volatility

RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to BetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF (BNKS.AX) at 5.84%. This indicates that RBTZ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBTZ.AX	BNKS.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.02%	5.84%	+4.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.99%	16.34%	+3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.30%	18.63%	+5.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.98%	19.25%	+3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.50%	20.35%	+2.15%

RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RBTZ.AX and BNKS.AX have an expense ratio of 0.57%.

Dividends

RBTZ.AX vs. BNKS.AX - Dividend Comparison

RBTZ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than BNKS.AX's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BNKS.AX BetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF	4.60%	0.72%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	2.71%	0.00%	1.23%	3.66%
RBTZ.AX BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.05%	1.87%	4.61%	0.05%	0.87%	3.02%	3.79%	0.51%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBTZ.AX and BNKS.AX in my portfolio?

RBTZ.AX and BNKS.AX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBTZ.AX or BNKS.AX?

Both ETFs have the same 0.57% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBTZ.AX or BNKS.AX?

RBTZ.AX and BNKS.AX have the same expense ratio: 0.57% per year.

What is the main difference between RBTZ.AX and BNKS.AX?

RBTZ.AX is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while BNKS.AX is Financials Equities. RBTZ.AX tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while BNKS.AX tracks Nasdaq Global ex-Australia Banks Hedged AUD Index.