PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (CYSE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBTX.L achieves a 29.04% return, which is significantly higher than CYSE.L's 24.45% return.


RBTX.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
9.00%
YTD
29.04%
6M
26.25%
1Y
47.66%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*

CYSE.L

1D
-1.44%
1M
26.86%
YTD
24.45%
6M
17.83%
1Y
12.00%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
29.04%9.17%7.51%32.05%-26.55%18.92%
CYSE.L
WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc
24.45%-8.72%13.36%60.49%-36.28%11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between RBTX.L and CYSE.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between RBTX.L and CYSE.L has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RBTX.L
CYSE.L

Technology

73.2%
100.0%

Industrials

25.1%

-

Healthcare

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

RBTX.L
73.2%
CYSE.L
100.0%

Industrials

RBTX.L
25.1%
CYSE.L

-

Healthcare

RBTX.L
1.6%
CYSE.L

-

Basic Materials

RBTX.L
0.1%
CYSE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

RBTX.L
0.1%
CYSE.L

-

Communication Services

RBTX.L

-

CYSE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

RBTX.L

-

CYSE.L

-

Energy

RBTX.L

-

CYSE.L

-

Financial Services

RBTX.L

-

CYSE.L

-

Real Estate

RBTX.L

-

CYSE.L

-

Utilities

RBTX.L

-

CYSE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBTX.L
RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CYSE.L
CYSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CYSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CYSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (CYSE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBTX.LCYSE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.10

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

0.38

+3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

0.87

+9.85

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the CYSE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBTX.L and CYSE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBTX.LCYSE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

0.37

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.34

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.24

+0.54

Drawdowns

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBTX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum CYSE.L drawdown of -46.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBTX.L and CYSE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBTX.LCYSE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-46.58%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-31.22%

+18.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-35.88%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.46%

-46.58%

+13.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-4.84%

+4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-19.16%

+10.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

13.71%

-9.28%

Volatility

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) is 7.01%, while WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (CYSE.L) has a volatility of 13.86%. This indicates that RBTX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYSE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBTX.LCYSE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

13.86%

-6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.35%

28.40%

-12.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.86%

32.03%

-11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.16%

31.30%

-10.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

31.34%

-10.64%

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBTX.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CYSE.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBTX.L vs. CYSE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RBTX.L nor CYSE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CYSE.L
WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.24%
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBTX.L and CYSE.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBTX.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBTX.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CYSE.L.

RBTX.L is categorized as Robotics, while CYSE.L is Technology Equities. RBTX.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while CYSE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBTX.L and 0.45% for CYSE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBTX.L and CYSE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer