PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBTX.L vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBTX.L vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RBTX.L is traded in GBp, while ANET is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANET values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBTX.L achieves a 32.14% return, which is significantly higher than ANET's 29.62% return.


RBTX.L

1D
3.16%
1M
8.29%
YTD
32.14%
6M
32.00%
1Y
50.78%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*

ANET

1D
3.51%
1M
18.29%
YTD
29.62%
6M
33.94%
1Y
85.25%
3Y*
60.04%
5Y*
50.29%
10Y*
44.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBTX.L vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
32.14%9.17%7.51%32.05%-26.55%22.26%35.08%32.52%-13.97%34.09%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
29.62%10.10%91.01%84.37%-5.55%99.76%38.66%-7.14%-5.26%122.39%

Correlation

The correlation between RBTX.L and ANET is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBTX.L vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBTX.L
RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBTX.L vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBTX.LANETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

3.03

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

6.01

+5.28

RBTX.L vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBTX.L and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBTX.L vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBTX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum ANET drawdown of -52.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBTX.L and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBTX.LANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-52.63%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-28.26%

+15.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-52.63%

+25.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.46%

-52.63%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.23%

+4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-13.78%

+4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

14.23%

-9.75%

Volatility

RBTX.L vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) is 9.28%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 15.85%. This indicates that RBTX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBTX.LANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

15.85%

-6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.74%

39.93%

-22.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

52.71%

-30.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

46.66%

-21.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

44.99%

-20.48%

Dividends

RBTX.L vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

Neither RBTX.L nor ANET has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RBTX.L and ANET have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBTX.L and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer