RBOT.L vs. XSTC.L
RBOT.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both Technology Equities funds - RBOT.L tracks the iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF while XSTC.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOT.L returned 9.32%/yr vs 19.88%/yr for XSTC.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBOT.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
RBOT.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RBOT.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT.L achieves a 23.01% return, which is significantly higher than XSTC.L's 17.63% return.
RBOT.L
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- YTD
- 23.01%
- 1Y
- 31.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- 20.26%
- YTD
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 32.06%
- 3Y*
- 29.30%
- 5Y*
- 19.88%
- 10Y*
- —
RBOT.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 23.01% | 17.58% | 5.55% | 39.74% | -34.43% | 20.69% | 39.88% | 36.88% | -21.29% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 17.63% | 22.94% | 37.18% | 56.67% | -30.82% | 32.26% | 45.87% | 48.94% | -5.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT.L and XSTC.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between RBOT.L and XSTC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT.L
XSTC.L
RBOT.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.82 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | 4.96 | +2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT.L drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -35.20% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -17.54% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.12% | -27.66% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.55% | -35.20% | -9.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.42% | -7.26% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -7.34% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 6.45% | -1.76% |
Volatility
RBOT.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOT.L) has a higher volatility of 10.24% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 7.59%. This indicates that RBOT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.24% | 7.59% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.69% | 17.41% | +4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.38% | 22.04% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 23.83% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 23.49% | -0.65% |
RBOT.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBOT.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBOT.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
RBOT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.27% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RBOT.L.
RBOT.L tracks iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOT.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for RBOT.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer