RBOT.L vs. XLKS.L
RBOT.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - RBOT.L tracks the iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF while XLKS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOT.L returned 9.32%/yr vs 22.18%/yr for XLKS.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBOT.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
RBOT.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT.L achieves a 23.01% return, which is significantly higher than XLKS.L's 17.68% return.
RBOT.L
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- YTD
- 23.01%
- 1Y
- 31.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 20.28%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 32.56%
- 3Y*
- 31.32%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 25.36%
RBOT.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 23.01% | 17.58% | 5.55% | 39.74% | -34.43% | 20.69% | 39.88% | 36.88% | -18.72% | 47.21% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 17.68% | 24.23% | 41.72% | 60.64% | -29.12% | 34.73% | 42.78% | 48.83% | -2.51% | 33.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT.L and XLKS.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RBOT.L and XLKS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT.L
XLKS.L
RBOT.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOT.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.91 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | 5.17 | +1.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT.L drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than XLKS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -34.26% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -16.99% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.12% | -26.97% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.55% | -34.26% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.42% | -7.74% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -5.14% | -5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 6.28% | -1.59% |
Volatility
RBOT.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOT.L) has a higher volatility of 10.24% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) at 7.31%. This indicates that RBOT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.24% | 7.31% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.69% | 17.62% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.38% | 22.00% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 24.13% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 22.18% | +0.66% |
RBOT.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBOT.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBOT.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RBOT.L nor XLKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RBOT.L.
RBOT.L tracks iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOT.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for RBOT.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer