RBOT.L vs. XLKQ.L
RBOT.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - RBOT.L tracks the iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF while XLKQ.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOT.L returned 9.32%/yr vs 22.29%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RBOT.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
RBOT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RBOT.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT.L achieves a 23.01% return, which is significantly higher than XLKQ.L's 17.97% return.
RBOT.L
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- YTD
- 23.01%
- 1Y
- 31.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 22.29%
- 10Y*
- 25.44%
RBOT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 23.01% | 17.58% | 5.55% | 39.74% | -34.43% | 20.69% | 39.88% | 36.88% | -18.72% | 47.21% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 17.97% | 24.49% | 41.63% | 59.85% | -29.07% | 35.05% | 42.15% | 50.17% | -3.26% | 33.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT.L and XLKQ.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between RBOT.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT.L
XLKQ.L
RBOT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOT.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.95 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | 5.35 | +1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT.L drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -39.80% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -16.81% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.12% | -26.96% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.55% | -35.00% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.42% | -7.48% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -9.18% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 6.13% | -1.44% |
Volatility
RBOT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOT.L) has a higher volatility of 10.24% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 7.47%. This indicates that RBOT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.24% | 7.47% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.69% | 17.08% | +4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.38% | 21.52% | +3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 27.46% | -3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 23.97% | -1.13% |
RBOT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBOT.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBOT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RBOT.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RBOT.L.
RBOT.L tracks iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOT.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for RBOT.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer