PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RBOT.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RBOT.L is traded in USD, while RBTX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RBTX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RBOT.L having a 19.00% return and RBTX.L slightly higher at 19.15%.


RBOT.L

1D
-3.19%
1M
-9.04%
6M
13.24%
YTD
19.00%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*

RBTX.L

1D
-3.03%
1M
-8.35%
6M
13.46%
YTD
19.15%
1Y
25.88%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBOT.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
19.00%17.58%5.55%39.74%-34.43%20.69%39.88%36.88%-18.72%47.21%
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
19.15%17.41%5.72%39.02%-34.40%21.16%39.22%37.84%-18.84%46.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOT.L and RBTX.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016

0.95

The correlation between RBOT.L and RBTX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBOT.L
RBOT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
RBOT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

RBTX.L
RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RBOT.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBOT.LRBTX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.68

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.46

5.40

+0.06

RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOT.L and RBTX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOT.L drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, roughly equal to the maximum RBTX.L drawdown of -44.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.L and RBTX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBOT.LRBTX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-44.44%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.07%

-15.36%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.12%

-24.96%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.55%

-44.44%

-0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.41%

-11.25%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-12.04%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

4.78%

-0.04%

Volatility

RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RBOT.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) have volatilities of 10.55% and 10.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBOT.LRBTX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.55%

10.63%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

21.57%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.58%

25.41%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.38%

27.50%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

25.81%

-2.95%

RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RBOT.L and RBTX.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

RBOT.L vs. RBTX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RBOT.L nor RBTX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, RBOT.L and RBTX.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBOT.L and RBTX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

RBOT.L tracks STOXX Global Automation & Robotics Net USD Index, while RBTX.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBOT.L and RBTX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer