PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBNNX vs. FQTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBNNX achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 3.68% return.


RBNNX

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-1.76%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
8.71%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
5.20%

FQTIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.62%
YTD
3.68%
6M
3.92%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RBNNX
Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund
-1.76%5.82%14.95%11.36%-7.29%12.37%-6.60%5.66%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
3.68%7.51%8.03%13.44%-14.39%8.51%3.68%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between RBNNX and FQTIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019

0.44

The correlation between RBNNX and FQTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBNNX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBNNX
RBNNX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
RBNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
RBNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FQTIX
FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBNNXFQTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.69

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

4.38

-3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

23.00

-21.44

RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBNNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the FQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBNNX and FQTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBNNX drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than FQTIX's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBNNX and FQTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBNNXFQTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.31%

-24.62%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.10%

-2.20%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.02%

-6.42%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.55%

-18.81%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.58%

-0.24%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-4.29%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

0.42%

+1.30%

Volatility

RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison

Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) at 0.82%. This indicates that RBNNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBNNXFQTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

0.82%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.83%

2.44%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

3.13%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

5.94%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

7.70%

+2.75%

RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBNNX has a 3.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison

RBNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than FQTIX's 6.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
6.84%5.70%7.86%7.64%8.10%7.15%6.89%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBNNX
Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund
7.49%5.19%3.80%2.81%2.54%3.64%6.84%6.93%9.84%5.95%7.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBNNX and FQTIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBNNX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to FQTIX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBNNX dropped -35.31% vs FQTIX's -24.62%.

FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBNNX and FQTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer