RBNNX vs. FQTIX
RBNNX (Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund) and FQTIX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RBNNX returned 5.05%/yr vs 3.53%/yr for FQTIX. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RBNNX charges 3.92%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQTIX.
Performance
RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBNNX achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 3.15% return.
RBNNX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 0.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.74%
FQTIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBNNX Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund | -1.56% | 5.82% | 14.95% | 11.36% | -7.29% | 12.37% | -6.60% | 5.66% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 3.15% | 7.51% | 8.03% | 13.44% | -14.39% | 8.51% | 3.68% | 4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBNNX and FQTIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019 | 0.44 |
The correlation between RBNNX and FQTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBNNX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank
RBNNX
FQTIX
RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBNNX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.53 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 3.37 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.00 | 16.44 | -16.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBNNX drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than FQTIX's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBNNX and FQTIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBNNX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -24.62% | -10.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.10% | -2.20% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.02% | -5.59% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.55% | -18.81% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -0.91% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -4.23% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 0.45% | +1.57% |
Volatility
RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison
Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund (RBNNX) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) at 0.60%. This indicates that RBNNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBNNX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 0.60% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.02% | 2.41% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.78% | 3.09% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 5.94% | +0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 7.64% | +2.79% |
RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBNNX has a 3.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBNNX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison
RBNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, less than FQTIX's 7.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 7.05% | 5.70% | 7.86% | 7.64% | 8.10% | 7.15% | 6.89% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBNNX Robinson Opportunistic Income Fund | 6.96% | 5.19% | 3.80% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 3.64% | 6.84% | 6.93% | 9.84% | 5.95% | 7.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBNNX and FQTIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBNNX has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to FQTIX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBNNX dropped -35.31% vs FQTIX's -24.62%.
FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBNNX and FQTIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer