RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO
RBNK.TO (RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF) and RPDH.TO (RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBNK.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index, while RPDH.TO is a Europe Equities fund actively managed by RBC. RBNK.TO is passively managed, while RPDH.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBNK.TO returned 20.65%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for RPDH.TO. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RBNK.TO charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for RPDH.TO.
Performance
RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBNK.TO achieves a 33.54% return, which is significantly higher than RPDH.TO's 18.78% return.
RBNK.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 32.63%
- YTD
- 33.54%
- 1Y
- 69.99%
- 3Y*
- 36.09%
- 5Y*
- 20.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.00%
RPDH.TO
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$2.68M | CA$2.48M | CA$2.41M | |
| CA$4.75K | CA$38.12K | CA$17.69K |
RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBNK.TO RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF | 33.54% | 44.94% | 23.12% | 11.05% | -13.12% | 40.33% | 3.38% | 16.86% | -9.12% | 3.92% |
RPDH.TO RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF | 18.78% | 30.87% | 7.58% | 17.83% | -6.14% | 23.21% | -7.43% | 17.35% | -8.22% | -1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBNK.TO and RPDH.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.34 |
The correlation between RBNK.TO and RPDH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RBNK.TO
RPDH.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
RBNK.TO
RPDH.TO
Basic Materials
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Communication Services
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Consumer Cyclical
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Consumer Defensive
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Energy
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Healthcare
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Industrials
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Real Estate
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Technology
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Utilities
RBNK.TO
-
RPDH.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RBNK.TO
RPDH.TO
RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK.TO) and RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RPDH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBNK.TO | RPDH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.82 | 1.60 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.67 | 4.26 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.78 | 16.74 | +15.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.23%, which is greater than RPDH.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBNK.TO and RPDH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBNK.TO | RPDH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.23% | -36.38% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -7.81% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.00% | -13.56% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -19.22% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | 0.00% | -2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -5.07% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.98% | +0.21% |
Volatility
RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO - Volatility Comparison
RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RPDH.TO) at 2.88%. This indicates that RBNK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPDH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBNK.TO | RPDH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 2.88% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.71% | 9.20% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 11.34% | +3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 13.87% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 16.12% | +2.11% |
RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBNK.TO has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than RPDH.TO's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBNK.TO vs. RPDH.TO - Dividend Comparison
RBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than RPDH.TO's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBNK.TO RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF | 2.71% | 3.39% | 4.50% | 4.81% | 4.52% | 3.09% | 4.21% | 3.89% | 4.09% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPDH.TO RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF | 2.99% | 3.08% | 3.71% | 3.42% | 4.00% | 2.38% | 3.27% | 5.42% | 5.06% | 2.91% | 3.80% | 3.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBNK.TO and RPDH.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBNK.TO is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBNK.TO is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for RPDH.TO.
RBNK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while RPDH.TO is Europe Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RBNK.TO and 0.57% for RPDH.TO.
Find the right allocation for RBNK.TO and RPDH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer