PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RAYS.L is traded in GBp, while RNRU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the RNRU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAYS.L achieves a 39.17% return, which is significantly higher than RNRU.L's 19.04% return.


RAYS.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
15.83%
YTD
39.17%
6M
42.81%
1Y
107.94%
3Y*
-3.85%
5Y*
10Y*

RNRU.L

1D
-2.01%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
19.04%
6M
18.21%
1Y
49.83%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RAYS.L
Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc
39.17%36.36%-36.34%-29.61%5.10%-12.93%
RNRU.L
Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
19.04%24.83%-21.90%-19.50%-0.25%-2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RAYS.L and RNRU.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.66

The correlation between RAYS.L and RNRU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAYS.L
RAYS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RAYS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAYS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAYS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
RAYS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAYS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

RNRU.L
RNRU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAYS.LRNRU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.52

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.02

8.92

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.84

29.05

-7.21

RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAYS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is comparable to the RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAYS.L and RNRU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAYS.LRNRU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27

3.13

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.12

+0.01

Drawdowns

RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYS.L drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, which is greater than RNRU.L's maximum drawdown of -53.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS.L and RNRU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAYS.LRNRU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.42%

-53.53%

-19.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-5.56%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.74%

-37.25%

-27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.84%

-20.48%

-12.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.69%

-29.04%

-12.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

1.71%

+3.22%

Volatility

RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) has a higher volatility of 12.48% compared to Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) at 5.73%. This indicates that RAYS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNRU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAYS.LRNRU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.48%

5.73%

+6.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.95%

11.94%

+10.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.89%

15.86%

+17.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.87%

18.35%

+18.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.87%

18.35%

+18.52%

RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAYS.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than RNRU.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAYS.L vs. RNRU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RAYS.L nor RNRU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RAYS.L and RNRU.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RNRU.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RNRU.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for RAYS.L.

Both ETFs track S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for RAYS.L and 0.50% for RNRU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAYS.L and RNRU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer