RAYS.L vs. FTWG.L
RAYS.L (Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc) and FTWG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - RAYS.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while FTWG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RAYS.L returned 107.94% vs 30.02% for FTWG.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAYS.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FTWG.L.
Performance
RAYS.L vs. FTWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAYS.L achieves a 39.17% return, which is significantly higher than FTWG.L's 11.87% return.
RAYS.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 15.83%
- YTD
- 39.17%
- 6M
- 42.81%
- 1Y
- 107.94%
- 3Y*
- -3.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTWG.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 12.02%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAYS.L vs. FTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RAYS.L Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 39.17% | 36.36% | -36.34% | -22.19% |
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 11.87% | 14.12% | 19.92% | 7.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAYS.L and FTWG.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAYS.L vs. FTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
RAYS.L
FTWG.L
RAYS.L vs. FTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RAYS.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.56 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.02 | 4.23 | +4.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.84 | 17.22 | +4.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAYS.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.27 | 2.92 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 1.55 | -1.65 |
Drawdowns
RAYS.L vs. FTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAYS.L drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, which is greater than FTWG.L's maximum drawdown of -17.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS.L and FTWG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAYS.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.42% | -17.78% | -55.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -7.11% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.84% | -0.42% | -32.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.69% | -1.99% | -39.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 1.75% | +3.18% |
Volatility
RAYS.L vs. FTWG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) has a higher volatility of 12.48% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) at 3.04%. This indicates that RAYS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAYS.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.48% | 3.04% | +9.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.95% | 7.59% | +14.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.89% | 10.28% | +22.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 11.89% | +24.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 11.89% | +24.98% |
RAYS.L vs. FTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAYS.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FTWG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAYS.L vs. FTWG.L - Dividend Comparison
RAYS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.50% | 0.70% |
RAYS.L Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAYS.L and FTWG.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTWG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for RAYS.L.
RAYS.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while FTWG.L is Global Equities. RAYS.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while FTWG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for RAYS.L and 0.15% for FTWG.L.
Find the right allocation for RAYS.L and FTWG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer