RAYJ vs. NBJP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RAYJ (Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF) and NBJP (Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds. Both are actively managed. RAYJ charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NBJP.

Performance

RAYJ vs. NBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF (RAYJ) and Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RAYJ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NBJP

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -4.55%
• 6M: 7.44%
• YTD: 14.39%
• 1Y: 27.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NBJP Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF	$908.32K	$596.18K	$649.03K
RAYJ Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RAYJ vs. NBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RAYJ Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF	0.00%
NBJP Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF	-0.33%

Return for Risk

RAYJ vs. NBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RAYJ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBJP

NBJP Risk / Return Rank: 54
NBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
NBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
NBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RAYJ vs. NBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF (RAYJ) and Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RAYJ	NBJP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.22	—

Drawdowns

RAYJ vs. NBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYJ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum NBJP drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYJ and NBJP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAYJ	NBJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-14.34%	+14.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.27%	+9.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-3.41%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RAYJ	NBJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.06%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	20.56%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	20.56%	—

RAYJ vs. NBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAYJ has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than NBJP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAYJ vs. NBJP - Dividend Comparison

RAYJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NBJP Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF	2.00%	2.29%	0.75%
RAYJ Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, RAYJ or NBJP?

On fees, NBJP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAYJ or NBJP?

NBJP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for RAYJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAYJ or NBJP?

NBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for RAYJ.

What is the main difference between RAYJ and NBJP?

They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for RAYJ and 0.50% for NBJP.