RAVI vs. VNLA
RAVI (FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF) and VNLA (Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. RAVI is actively managed, while VNLA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RAVI returned 3.52%/yr vs 3.83%/yr for VNLA. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAVI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for VNLA.
Performance
RAVI vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RAVI having a 1.66% return and VNLA slightly lower at 1.59%.
RAVI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
VNLA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- —
RAVI vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.66% | 4.98% | 5.67% | 5.55% | 0.15% | -0.04% | 2.06% | 3.49% | 1.65% | 1.22% |
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 1.59% | 5.45% | 6.41% | 6.09% | -0.17% | -0.18% | 3.01% | 4.43% | 0.02% | 2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAVI and VNLA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016 | 0.25 |
The correlation between RAVI and VNLA shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAVI vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank
RAVI
VNLA
RAVI vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RAVI | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.64 | 3.56 | +2.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 38.65 | 11.10 | +27.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 231.44 | 57.09 | +174.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RAVI vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAVI drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum VNLA drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAVI and VNLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAVI | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -4.49% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | -0.43% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.36% | -0.49% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.28% | -1.76% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.23% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.08% | -0.06% |
Volatility
RAVI vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) is 0.10%, while Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) has a volatility of 0.15%. This indicates that RAVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAVI | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.15% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.30% | 0.46% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40% | 0.63% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.41% | 1.04% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.28% | 1.42% | -0.14% |
RAVI vs. VNLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAVI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VNLA's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RAVI vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison
RAVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than VNLA's 4.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.38% | 4.59% | 5.34% | 4.55% | 1.70% | 0.90% | 1.29% | 2.53% | 2.22% | 1.28% | 0.90% |
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 4.77% | 4.84% | 4.97% | 3.95% | 4.35% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 3.13% | 2.43% | 1.79% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAVI and VNLA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNLA has higher volatility (0.15%) compared to RAVI (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAVI dropped -3.72% vs VNLA's -4.49%.
On 5-year performance, VNLA leads with 3.83% vs 3.52% for RAVI. On fees, VNLA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 3.83% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNLA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RAVI.
VNLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.38% for RAVI.
They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RAVI and 0.23% for VNLA.
RAVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.19 vs 7.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RAVI and VNLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer