PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR (RAND.DE) and 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RAND.DE
CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR
-17.13%-63.34%46.73%44.34%-56.05%
ETHC.DE
21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP
-27.44%-21.50%52.05%90.66%-17.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAND.DE achieves a -17.13% return, which is significantly higher than ETHC.DE's -27.44% return.


RAND.DE

1D
19.53%
1M
21.31%
YTD
-17.13%
6M
-49.91%
1Y
-47.19%
3Y*
-22.37%
5Y*
10Y*

ETHC.DE

1D
2.75%
1M
4.78%
YTD
-27.44%
6M
-50.15%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAND.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHC.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAND.DE
RAND.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
RAND.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAND.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAND.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
RAND.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAND.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHC.DE
ETHC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ETHC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR (RAND.DE) and 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAND.DEETHC.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.47

0.07

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.23

0.59

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.07

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

0.09

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.89

0.19

-1.08

RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAND.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the ETHC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAND.DE and ETHC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAND.DEETHC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

0.07

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.29

0.15

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between RAND.DE and ETHC.DE is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RAND.DE nor ETHC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAND.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.60%, which is greater than ETHC.DE's maximum drawdown of -64.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAND.DE and ETHC.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RAND.DEETHC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.60%

-64.71%

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.75%

-60.75%

-12.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.42%

-53.86%

-28.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.06%

-21.89%

-37.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.20%

29.16%

+14.04%

Volatility

RAND.DE vs. ETHC.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Staked Algorand EUR (RAND.DE) has a higher volatility of 24.86% compared to 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE) at 17.81%. This indicates that RAND.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RAND.DEETHC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.86%

17.81%

+7.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.03%

45.62%

+21.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.91%

65.55%

+33.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.48%

61.23%

+32.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.48%

61.23%

+32.25%