PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RALIX vs. TZINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RALIX vs. TZINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) and Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RALIX achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly higher than TZINX's 10.33% return.


RALIX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.70%
6M
10.20%
YTD
11.85%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*

TZINX

1D
0.64%
1M
1.42%
6M
7.75%
YTD
10.33%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RALIX vs. TZINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RALIX
Lazard Real Assets Portfolio
11.85%15.60%5.91%4.43%-8.99%22.32%0.61%16.07%-7.59%8.60%
TZINX
Templeton Global Balanced Fund
10.33%27.85%0.73%14.45%-14.31%-1.44%1.70%7.58%-9.18%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RALIX and TZINX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.68

The correlation between RALIX and TZINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RALIX vs. TZINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RALIX
RALIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TZINX
TZINX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TZINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TZINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TZINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TZINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TZINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RALIX vs. TZINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) and Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RALIXTZINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.54

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

9.58

+1.46

RALIX vs. TZINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RALIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the TZINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RALIX and TZINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RALIX vs. TZINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RALIX drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum TZINX drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RALIX and TZINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RALIXTZINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-36.06%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.46%

-8.42%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.72%

-11.50%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-27.83%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-0.32%

-2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-7.45%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.24%

-0.45%

Volatility

RALIX vs. TZINX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) and Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX) have volatilities of 3.07% and 3.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RALIXTZINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.17%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

8.75%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

10.53%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.86%

11.93%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.17%

11.07%

+0.10%

RALIX vs. TZINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RALIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than TZINX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RALIX vs. TZINX - Dividend Comparison

RALIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.59%, more than TZINX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RALIX
Lazard Real Assets Portfolio
8.59%7.04%3.07%2.93%7.65%11.84%3.93%2.24%5.27%1.69%0.00%0.00%
TZINX
Templeton Global Balanced Fund
4.75%4.00%5.43%3.68%3.47%2.24%2.12%4.43%4.55%2.82%1.12%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


RALIX and TZINX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TZINX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to RALIX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RALIX dropped -24.00% vs TZINX's -36.06%.

RALIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RALIX and TZINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer