RACE vs. PHPP.L
RACE (Ferrari N.V.) is a stock, while PHPP.L (WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Precious Metals Basket. Over the past 10 years, RACE returned 25.54%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for PHPP.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RACE vs. PHPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RACE is traded in USD, while PHPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PHPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RACE achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than PHPP.L's -8.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RACE has outperformed PHPP.L with an annualized return of 25.54%, while PHPP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.28% annualized return.
RACE
- 1D
- 5.50%
- 1M
- 11.04%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- -22.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- 25.54%
PHPP.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -16.12%
- YTD
- -8.71%
- 6M
- -3.35%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 24.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
RACE vs. PHPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RACE Ferrari N.V. | 1.23% | -11.65% | 26.34% | 59.12% | -16.68% | 13.32% | 39.71% | 67.87% | -4.47% | 81.95% |
PHPP.L WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals | -8.71% | 85.47% | 15.31% | -3.73% | -0.29% | -11.08% | 26.04% | 27.32% | -0.53% | 15.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RACE and PHPP.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RACE vs. PHPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
RACE
PHPP.L
RACE vs. PHPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferrari N.V. (RACE) and WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RACE | PHPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.20 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 1.05 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 2.72 | -3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RACE vs. PHPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RACE drawdown since its inception was -46.67%, smaller than the maximum PHPP.L drawdown of -70.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACE and PHPP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RACE | PHPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.67% | -70.33% | +23.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.22% | -31.77% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.22% | -31.77% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.22% | -31.77% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | -31.77% | -7.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.73% | -31.77% | +4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.49% | -37.55% | +26.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.95% | 12.25% | +12.70% |
Volatility
RACE vs. PHPP.L - Volatility Comparison
Ferrari N.V. (RACE) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L) at 8.59%. This indicates that RACE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RACE | PHPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.09% | 8.59% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.54% | 31.09% | -6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.25% | 33.71% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.53% | 23.53% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.54% | 20.89% | +8.65% |
Dividends
RACE vs. PHPP.L - Dividend Comparison
RACE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, while PHPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHPP.L WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RACE Ferrari N.V. | 2.33% | 1.85% | 0.61% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.70% | 0.88% | 0.61% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RACE and PHPP.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RACE and PHPP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer