PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NESG.L vs. SWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NESG.L vs. SWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NESG.L vs. SWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NESG.L
Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc
-8.85%21.09%26.52%56.71%-32.09%1.40%
SWRD.L
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
-4.94%21.09%19.26%24.41%-17.81%0.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NESG.L achieves a -8.85% return, which is significantly lower than SWRD.L's -4.94% return.


NESG.L

1D
0.83%
1M
-6.05%
YTD
-8.85%
6M
-5.38%
1Y
24.19%
3Y*
22.01%
5Y*
10Y*

SWRD.L

1D
0.55%
1M
-7.20%
YTD
-4.94%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NESG.L vs. SWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NESG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SWRD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NESG.L vs. SWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NESG.L
NESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SWRD.L
SWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NESG.L vs. SWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NESG.LSWRD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.23

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

1.73

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.51

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.03

7.22

-1.19

NESG.L vs. SWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NESG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NESG.L and SWRD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NESG.LSWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.23

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.71

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between NESG.L and SWRD.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NESG.L vs. SWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NESG.L nor SWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NESG.L vs. SWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NESG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.69%, roughly equal to the maximum SWRD.L drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESG.L and SWRD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NESG.LSWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.69%

-34.10%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.01%

-11.47%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.29%

-7.72%

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-5.11%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.40%

+1.20%

Volatility

NESG.L vs. SWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) at 4.72%. This indicates that NESG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NESG.LSWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

4.72%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

8.44%

+3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.73%

15.29%

+4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.60%

15.43%

+7.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.60%

17.31%

+5.29%