QYLU.L vs. SILG.L
QYLU.L (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLU.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QYLU.L returned 12.61%/yr vs 41.58%/yr for SILG.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QYLU.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QYLU.L is traded in USD, while SILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SILG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLU.L achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's -9.39% return.
QYLU.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -13.36%
- 6M
- -20.80%
- YTD
- -9.39%
- 1Y
- 58.71%
- 3Y*
- 41.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLU.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLU.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 8.26% | 5.59% | 22.94% | 22.59% | -2.11% |
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -9.39% | 173.15% | 11.64% | -1.40% | 6.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLU.L and SILG.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLU.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank
QYLU.L
SILG.L
QYLU.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLU.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLU.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 1.52 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 3.40 | +10.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLU.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, smaller than the maximum SILG.L drawdown of -38.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLU.L and SILG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLU.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -38.86% | +18.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -38.86% | +33.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | -38.86% | +18.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -35.74% | +35.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -13.72% | +11.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 17.30% | -15.85% |
Volatility
QYLU.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLU.L) is 4.86%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 15.78%. This indicates that QYLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLU.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 15.78% | -10.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 44.46% | -35.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 55.10% | -42.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 43.42% | -27.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 43.42% | -27.81% |
Dividends
QYLU.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither QYLU.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLU.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. QYLU.L tracks Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index.
Find the right allocation for QYLU.L and SILG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer