QYLU.L vs. KSTR.L
QYLU.L (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF) and KSTR.L (KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - QYLU.L tracks the Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF while KSTR.L tracks the KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QYLU.L returned 12.61%/yr vs 21.29%/yr for KSTR.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QYLU.L vs. KSTR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLU.L achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR.L's 41.53% return.
QYLU.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KSTR.L
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 25.64%
- YTD
- 41.53%
- 1Y
- 93.56%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- -0.22%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLU.L vs. KSTR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLU.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 8.26% | 5.59% | 22.94% | 22.59% | -2.11% |
KSTR.L KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF | 41.53% | 42.76% | 5.23% | -18.80% | -4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLU.L and KSTR.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLU.L vs. KSTR.L — Risk / Return Rank
QYLU.L
KSTR.L
QYLU.L vs. KSTR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLU.L) and KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLU.L | KSTR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 4.76 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 12.21 | +1.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLU.L vs. KSTR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, smaller than the maximum KSTR.L drawdown of -66.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLU.L and KSTR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLU.L | KSTR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -66.67% | +46.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -19.42% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | -36.60% | +16.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -18.75% | +18.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -39.83% | +37.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 7.58% | -6.13% |
Volatility
QYLU.L vs. KSTR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLU.L) is 4.86%, while KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) has a volatility of 19.20%. This indicates that QYLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSTR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLU.L | KSTR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 19.20% | -14.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 33.48% | -24.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 40.57% | -27.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 34.52% | -18.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 34.46% | -18.85% |
Dividends
QYLU.L vs. KSTR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither QYLU.L nor KSTR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLU.L and KSTR.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLU.L tracks Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF, while KSTR.L tracks KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Global X and KraneShares.
Find the right allocation for QYLU.L and KSTR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer