QYLU.L vs. JEPQ.L
QYLU.L (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and JEPQ.L (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QYLU.L is passively managed, while JEPQ.L is actively managed. Over the past year, QYLU.L returned 16.53% vs 19.61% for JEPQ.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QYLU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.L.
Performance
QYLU.L vs. JEPQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLU.L achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.L's 6.36% return.
QYLU.L
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.L
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLU.L vs. JEPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QYLU.L Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.87% | 5.59% | 6.07% |
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 6.36% | 14.79% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLU.L and JEPQ.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between QYLU.L and JEPQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLU.L vs. JEPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
QYLU.L
JEPQ.L
QYLU.L vs. JEPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QYLU.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLU.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.36 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.23 | 9.69 | +1.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLU.L vs. JEPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, roughly equal to the maximum JEPQ.L drawdown of -20.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLU.L and JEPQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLU.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -20.08% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -8.31% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -3.76% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -2.68% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 2.02% | -0.55% |
Volatility
QYLU.L vs. JEPQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QYLU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) at 5.08%. This indicates that QYLU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLU.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 5.08% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 10.42% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 13.28% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 16.33% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 16.33% | -0.68% |
QYLU.L vs. JEPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QYLU.L vs. JEPQ.L - Dividend Comparison
QYLU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.35% | 10.06% | 0.74% |
QYLU.L Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLU.L and JEPQ.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPQ.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPQ.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QYLU.L.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QYLU.L and 0.35% for JEPQ.L.
Find the right allocation for QYLU.L and JEPQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer