QYLU.L vs. HKOD.L
QYLU.L (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF) and HKOD.L (HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - QYLU.L tracks the Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF while HKOD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QYLU.L returned 12.61%/yr vs 37.85%/yr for HKOD.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QYLU.L vs. HKOD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLU.L achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than HKOD.L's 70.37% return.
QYLU.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HKOD.L
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -20.60%
- 6M
- 52.67%
- YTD
- 70.37%
- 1Y
- 138.83%
- 3Y*
- 37.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- 14.34%
QYLU.L vs. HKOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLU.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 8.26% | 5.59% | 22.94% | 22.59% | -2.11% |
HKOD.L HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF | 70.37% | 99.54% | -22.90% | 19.95% | 1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLU.L and HKOD.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLU.L vs. HKOD.L — Risk / Return Rank
QYLU.L
HKOD.L
QYLU.L vs. HKOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLU.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLU.L | HKOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 5.77 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 17.93 | -3.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLU.L vs. HKOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, smaller than the maximum HKOD.L drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLU.L and HKOD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLU.L | HKOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -50.54% | +30.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -24.00% | +19.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | -29.48% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -24.00% | +23.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -18.79% | +16.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 7.75% | -6.30% |
Volatility
QYLU.L vs. HKOD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF (QYLU.L) is 4.86%, while HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) has a volatility of 20.20%. This indicates that QYLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLU.L | HKOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 20.20% | -15.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 41.23% | -31.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 45.10% | -32.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 29.74% | -14.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 26.96% | -11.35% |
Dividends
QYLU.L vs. HKOD.L - Dividend Comparison
QYLU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HKOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HKOD.L HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF | 0.43% | 0.68% | 1.54% | 1.08% | 0.72% | 0.61% | 0.02% | 0.29% | 0.56% | 0.10% |
QYLU.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLU.L and HKOD.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLU.L tracks Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF, while HKOD.L tracks HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Global X and HSBC.
Find the right allocation for QYLU.L and HKOD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer