PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

QXM.TO (CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF) and XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QXM.TO returned 10.71%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for XIC.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXM.TO achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly lower than XIC.TO's 11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, QXM.TO has underperformed XIC.TO with an annualized return of 10.71%, while XIC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.

QXM.TO

1D
-1.03%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.00%
6M
5.73%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
10.71%

XIC.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
0.80%
YTD
11.15%
6M
10.58%
1Y
32.78%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF		6.00%23.46%20.08%13.24%-6.91%16.60%1.63%24.81%-9.15%15.66%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		11.15%31.51%21.48%11.74%-5.82%23.43%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between QXM.TO and XIC.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012

0.53

The correlation between QXM.TO and XIC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Often compared with XIC.TO:
XIC.TO vs. XIU.TOXIC.TO vs. VDY.TOXIC.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIC.TO vs. VCE.TOXIC.TO vs. XEF.TOXIC.TO vs. VEQT.TOXIC.TO vs. VO

Return for Risk

QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QXM.TO
QXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QXM.TOXIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.85
2.51

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.72
3.25

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.44

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.55

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

16.08

-6.56

QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXM.TO and XIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, smaller than the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -47.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXM.TO and XIC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QXM.TOXIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.65%

-47.27%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-9.29%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-12.27%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.01%

-16.24%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.65%

-37.21%

-3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.42%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-6.72%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.04%

+0.49%

Volatility

QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) is 2.48%, while iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that QXM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QXM.TOXIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

4.14%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

10.74%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

13.13%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

13.22%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

14.96%

+0.68%

Dividends

QXM.TO vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

QXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than XIC.TO's 2.02% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF		1.01%1.17%1.27%1.39%1.51%1.02%1.27%1.39%1.65%1.36%1.56%1.52%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		2.02%2.23%2.64%2.96%3.10%2.45%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

QXM.TO and XIC.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: CI and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXM.TO and XIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer