QVMT vs. BUFP
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP).
QVMT and BUFP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVMT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2015. BUFP is a passively managed fund by PGIM that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024. Both QVMT and BUFP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QVMT vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QVMT vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 4.72% | 19.08% | 6.17% |
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | -1.34% | 12.92% | 6.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMT achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's -1.34% return.
QVMT
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 9.66%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
BUFP
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 13.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVMT vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QVMT vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank
QVMT
BUFP
QVMT vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVMT | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.23 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.86 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.71 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.47 | 9.81 | -3.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVMT | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.23 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.02 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMT and BUFP is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QVMT vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison
QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 2.30% | 2.42% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 2.70% | 2.23% | 2.48% | 2.37% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QVMT vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.05%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMT and BUFP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMT | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.05% | -11.98% | -36.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -8.16% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.21% | -2.54% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -1.08% | -5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.42% | +1.53% |
Volatility
QVMT vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 3.41%. This indicates that QVMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QVMT | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 3.41% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 4.99% | +4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 11.11% | +5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 9.79% | +7.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 9.79% | +11.29% |