PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVGIX vs. HRLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVGIX vs. HRLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Allocation Fund (QVGIX) and Hartford Real Asset Fund (HRLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVGIX achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than HRLYX's 14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, QVGIX has underperformed HRLYX with an annualized return of 6.54%, while HRLYX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.29% annualized return.


QVGIX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.27%
6M
4.93%
YTD
8.11%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
6.54%
ALL TIME*
6.76%

HRLYX

1D
-0.36%
1M
4.45%
6M
9.32%
YTD
14.42%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
7.29%
ALL TIME*
3.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QVGIX vs. HRLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVGIX
Invesco Global Allocation Fund
8.11%13.68%5.63%15.63%-17.60%10.45%14.42%16.35%-9.74%14.83%
HRLYX
Hartford Real Asset Fund
14.42%21.89%-5.41%7.44%0.72%21.58%-1.13%12.34%-10.11%9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between QVGIX and HRLYX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between QVGIX and HRLYX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVGIX vs. HRLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QVGIX
QVGIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QVGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QVGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

HRLYX
HRLYX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HRLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
HRLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QVGIX vs. HRLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Allocation Fund (QVGIX) and Hartford Real Asset Fund (HRLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QVGIXHRLYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.65

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

4.43

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

17.16

-7.39

QVGIX vs. HRLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the HRLYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVGIX and HRLYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVGIX vs. HRLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVGIX drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum HRLYX drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVGIX and HRLYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVGIXHRLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-45.58%

+22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-5.42%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.96%

-11.17%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-16.86%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.91%

-36.82%

+13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.36%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-14.26%

+10.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.40%

+0.21%

Volatility

QVGIX vs. HRLYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Allocation Fund (QVGIX) is 2.15%, while Hartford Real Asset Fund (HRLYX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that QVGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVGIXHRLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

2.33%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

5.75%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.57%

7.14%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.84%

10.77%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.94%

12.60%

-1.66%

QVGIX vs. HRLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVGIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than HRLYX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVGIX vs. HRLYX - Dividend Comparison

QVGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than HRLYX's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRLYX
Hartford Real Asset Fund
3.45%3.95%0.00%4.36%4.79%19.52%3.10%3.11%2.49%3.62%0.76%1.33%
QVGIX
Invesco Global Allocation Fund
6.28%6.79%0.93%2.27%6.10%14.15%0.00%0.00%9.56%0.13%3.34%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVGIX and HRLYX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRLYX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to QVGIX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVGIX dropped -22.91% vs HRLYX's -45.58%.

HRLYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVGIX and HRLYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer