PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

QUU.TO (Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF) and QBB.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while QBB.TO is a Total Bond Market fund actively managed by Mackenzie. QUU.TO is passively managed, while QBB.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QUU.TO returned 15.31%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for QBB.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (QBB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUU.TO achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than QBB.TO's 0.99% return.

QUU.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.47%
6M
11.27%
YTD
13.61%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
23.11%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
—

QBB.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.68%
6M
0.45%
YTD
0.99%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.41%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF		13.61%13.08%35.77%25.01%-15.10%26.45%18.85%24.81%0.56%
QBB.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF		0.99%2.70%3.90%7.16%-11.56%-2.12%6.73%7.32%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between QUU.TO and QBB.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2018

0.08

Over the past year, QUU.TO and QBB.TO have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF

Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF

Often compared with QUU.TO:
QUU.TO vs. XEQT.TOQUU.TO vs. VOOQUU.TO vs. VUN.TOQUU.TO vs. VTIQUU.TO vs. XUS.TOQUU.TO vs. ZNQ.TOQUU.TO vs. ZEA.TO

Return for Risk

QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QUU.TO
QUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
QBB.TO
QBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
QBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
QBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (QBB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QUU.TOQBB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.98
0.99

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
1.42

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.18

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

1.46

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

3.72

+6.72

QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the QBB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUU.TO and QBB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUU.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than QBB.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUU.TO and QBB.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QUU.TOQBB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.86%

-16.70%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-2.81%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

-4.21%

-15.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.00%

-15.32%

-8.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.16%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-4.62%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

1.10%

+1.31%

Volatility

QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (QBB.TO) at 1.10%. This indicates that QUU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QUU.TOQBB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

1.10%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

3.23%

+6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

4.18%

+8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

6.15%

+9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

6.26%

+10.98%

Dividends

QUU.TO vs. QBB.TO - Dividend Comparison

QUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than QBB.TO's 3.16% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QBB.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF		3.16%3.22%3.00%2.72%2.42%2.64%2.26%2.72%2.62%
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF		0.88%0.97%1.00%1.21%1.59%0.98%1.34%1.59%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

QUU.TO and QBB.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QBB.TO is Total Bond Market.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUU.TO and QBB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer