QUTM.DE vs. IEVD.DE
QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) and IEVD.DE (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Technology Equities funds - QUTM.DE tracks the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR) while IEVD.DE tracks the STOXX® Global Electric Vehicles & Driving Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QUTM.DE returned 33.19% vs 58.47% for IEVD.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QUTM.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IEVD.DE.
Performance
QUTM.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUTM.DE achieves a 13.28% return, which is significantly lower than IEVD.DE's 41.56% return.
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEVD.DE
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- 6M
- 36.97%
- YTD
- 41.56%
- 1Y
- 58.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 13.28% | 14.27% |
IEVD.DE iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 41.56% | 21.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUTM.DE and IEVD.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.60 |
The correlation between QUTM.DE and IEVD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUTM.DE vs. IEVD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QUTM.DE
IEVD.DE
QUTM.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUTM.DE | IEVD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.36 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 4.49 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 12.47 | -9.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUTM.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUTM.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, smaller than the maximum IEVD.DE drawdown of -42.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUTM.DE and IEVD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUTM.DE | IEVD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.77% | -42.30% | +17.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -12.96% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.69% | -12.50% | -6.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -9.68% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.79% | 4.68% | +6.11% |
Volatility
QUTM.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) is 7.62%, while iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that QUTM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEVD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUTM.DE | IEVD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 10.09% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.70% | 23.05% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.03% | 27.16% | +6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 22.96% | +9.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 24.23% | +8.63% |
QUTM.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUTM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IEVD.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUTM.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUTM.DE nor IEVD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUTM.DE and IEVD.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEVD.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEVD.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR), while IEVD.DE tracks STOXX® Global Electric Vehicles & Driving Technology. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for QUTM.DE and 0.40% for IEVD.DE.
Find the right allocation for QUTM.DE and IEVD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer