QUTM.DE vs. IBCI.DE
QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) and IBCI.DE (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR), while IBCI.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QUTM.DE returned 55.17% vs 2.64% for IBCI.DE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QUTM.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IBCI.DE.
Performance
QUTM.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUTM.DE achieves a 26.79% return, which is significantly higher than IBCI.DE's 3.01% return.
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 26.79%
- 6M
- 26.44%
- 1Y
- 55.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBCI.DE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 2.99%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 2.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
QUTM.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 26.79% | 14.27% |
IBCI.DE iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF | 3.01% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUTM.DE and IBCI.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUTM.DE vs. IBCI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QUTM.DE
IBCI.DE
QUTM.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) and iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUTM.DE | IBCI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.11 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 1.23 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 2.90 | +2.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUTM.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUTM.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, which is greater than IBCI.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUTM.DE and IBCI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUTM.DE | IBCI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.77% | -16.37% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -1.87% | -22.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -5.67% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -3.77% | -3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.14% | 0.79% | +9.35% |
Volatility
QUTM.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) at 1.61%. This indicates that QUTM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUTM.DE | IBCI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.21% | 1.61% | +12.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.16% | 3.00% | +21.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.44% | 3.82% | +29.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 6.86% | +26.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 6.16% | +26.90% |
QUTM.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUTM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IBCI.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUTM.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUTM.DE nor IBCI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUTM.DE and IBCI.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
QUTM.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBCI.DE is Inflation-Protected Bonds. QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR), while IBCI.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for QUTM.DE and 0.09% for IBCI.DE.
Find the right allocation for QUTM.DE and IBCI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer