PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QUTM.DE is traded in EUR, while AINF.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AINF.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUTM.DE achieves a 33.86% return, which is significantly lower than AINF.AS's 58.99% return.


QUTM.DE

1D
-1.49%
1M
18.24%
YTD
33.86%
6M
29.29%
1Y
59.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AINF.AS

1D
-1.98%
1M
22.39%
YTD
58.99%
6M
58.92%
1Y
114.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QUTM.DE and AINF.AS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2025

0.68

The correlation between QUTM.DE and AINF.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUTM.DE
QUTM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

AINF.AS
AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUTM.DEAINF.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.69

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

9.72

-7.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

32.15

-26.34

QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio of 4.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUTM.DE and AINF.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUTM.DEAINF.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

4.55

-2.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

2.16

-0.45

Drawdowns

QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUTM.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum AINF.AS drawdown of -30.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUTM.DE and AINF.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUTM.DEAINF.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-30.52%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.74%

-11.60%

-12.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-1.98%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-5.71%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.15%

3.53%

+6.62%

Volatility

QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) at 9.35%. This indicates that QUTM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AINF.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUTM.DEAINF.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.36%

9.35%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.92%

18.82%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.14%

24.75%

+5.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.16%

28.41%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.16%

28.41%

+1.75%

QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUTM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AINF.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QUTM.DE vs. AINF.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUTM.DE nor AINF.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QUTM.DE and AINF.AS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AINF.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINF.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR), while AINF.AS tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for QUTM.DE and 0.35% for AINF.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUTM.DE and AINF.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer